site stats

I recommend minor revision

WebResponse: A minor revision often implies that there are a limited number of changes that are needed to improve the manuscript for publication. Depending on the extent of the minor revision, the editor may decide not to send it out for re-review. A major revision often requires more substantive changes prior to being appropriate for publication. WebNov 5, 2012 · The associate editor makes one of four recommendations for publication: accept, accept with minor revisions, major revisions required with no guarantee of acceptance, and reject. The associate editor makes a recommendation to the editor for a …

Can you help me understand this comment on my review article …

WebAug 10, 2024 · Usually, you would see “Minor Revisions Required” or “Major Revisions Required” if the journal wants you to revise your manuscript to address specific concerns … WebThe first read-through is a skim-read. It will help you form an initial impression of the paper and get a sense of whether your eventual recommendation will be to accept or reject the paper. First Read Considerations Keep a pen and paper handy when skim-reading. slushed llc https://lillicreazioni.com

How to Write a Peer Review - PLOS

WebApr 14, 2024 · Track: Rhythm Guitar - Distortion GuitarDifficulty (Rhythm):Revised on: 4/14/2024. Request official audio. SPEED 100%. WebApr 16, 2024 · My review article received a minor revision with one of the comments as follows: “The advantages, disadvantages, and synergy of each strategy need to be … Webrecommend this manuscript to be published with a minor revision. • Response: The comments and suggestionsfrom the referee#1 are greatly appreciated. All technical … slush cuppy

The Publication Process: The submission process: Revisions

Category:What

Tags:I recommend minor revision

I recommend minor revision

Peer Review Process Wiley

WebCommon reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. There are six common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision: The literature review can benefit from additional sources: As a reviewer with expertise on the topic of the manuscript, you may be aware of a recent publication or discussion that the authors do not include yet. The relevance and originality … WebMinor issues are still important but typically will not affect the overall conclusions of the manuscript. Here are some examples of what would might go in the “minor” category: Missing references (but depending on what is missing, this could also be a major issue) Technical clarifications (e.g., the authors should clarify how a reagent works)

I recommend minor revision

Did you know?

WebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further … WebRelated to Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review. Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.. Peer Review …

WebNov 21, 2024 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. What does this mean? And normally how long does this round of review take? Kind regards. Asked on 21 Nov, 2024 Answer Follow this Question WebIf recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. The author can then reply to each point in turn. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection …

WebNov 21, 2024 · I submitted my paper to a Springer journal. After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable … WebNo, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to make the remaining changes during proofs. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your …

WebOne recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance.) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. So I'm wondering which one this response is. THANKS!! Vote 9 9 comments Best Add a Comment

WebMinor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. This is actually a policy for many journals. Do the revisions and resubmit. slushed heilbronnWebApr 15, 2024 · Six minor proposals were rejected, including forcing large companies to publish how many over-55s they employ, and the creation of a special contract for older … slush drink recipes with alcoholWebNov 27, 2024 · I have submitted my manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed journals of chemistry and the decision was 'recommended for publication subject to minor revision'. I … solar panel for motorcycleWeb1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … slushed face whatsapp emojiWebReviewer #I recommended publication; Reviewer #2 suggested 5 or 6 major modifications, any one of which would require essentially the researching and writing of another paper, and 2 or 3 years of ... solar panel for mobile phone chargingWebJan 8, 2014 · First, if you agree with the reviewer, you should do exactly what the reviewer ask you to do, and mention that you have done it. Then the reviewer should be happy. Second, you can disagree with the reviewer and explain why you disagree. In this case, you only need to explain why you disagree. But you need to explain well why. solar panel for phone chargingWebRecommend Immediate-Reject If you feel the manuscript is 1) out of the scope of TMI, or 2) the quality is too low to meet TMI standards, or 3) the novelty of the work is insignificant, or 4) just “good” instead of “exceptional” or “excellent”, you are encouraged to recommend an immediate reject without pursuing the full review process. solar panel for rv trailer battery charging