I recommend minor revision
WebCommon reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision. There are six common reasons for a ‘minor revisions’ decision: The literature review can benefit from additional sources: As a reviewer with expertise on the topic of the manuscript, you may be aware of a recent publication or discussion that the authors do not include yet. The relevance and originality … WebMinor issues are still important but typically will not affect the overall conclusions of the manuscript. Here are some examples of what would might go in the “minor” category: Missing references (but depending on what is missing, this could also be a major issue) Technical clarifications (e.g., the authors should clarify how a reagent works)
I recommend minor revision
Did you know?
WebIn other words, if you receive such a revised manuscript for review, you should make either a recommendation to accept (possibly with a minor revision) or reject with no further … WebRelated to Response times for Exams requiring Sonographer review. Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.. Peer Review …
WebNov 21, 2024 · After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable pending revision.’ I submitted the revised version, and now, the status is Under Review. What does this mean? And normally how long does this round of review take? Kind regards. Asked on 21 Nov, 2024 Answer Follow this Question WebIf recommending revision, state specific changes you feel need to be made. The author can then reply to each point in turn. Some journals offer the option to recommend rejection …
WebNov 21, 2024 · I submitted my paper to a Springer journal. After two months, I received minor revision as the decision. The statement was: ‘Your paper was found acceptable … WebNo, minor revision doesn't mean accepted with minor revisions. Strictly speaking, for truly minor revisions, it's possible that the editor accepts your paper and leaves you to make the remaining changes during proofs. Since the editor didn't do this, it's still possible your …
WebOne recommended major revision, two recommended minor revision, and one recommended acceptance.) I know that revisions, both major and minor, hint at a higher chance of acceptance. Revise and resubmit, however, is likely followed by a rejection. So I'm wondering which one this response is. THANKS!! Vote 9 9 comments Best Add a Comment
WebMinor revisions and major revisions are the two most common editorial decisions after peer review. A decision of minor revisions means your work will likely not be going back to the original peer reviewers for another round of comments. This is actually a policy for many journals. Do the revisions and resubmit. slushed heilbronnWebApr 15, 2024 · Six minor proposals were rejected, including forcing large companies to publish how many over-55s they employ, and the creation of a special contract for older … slush drink recipes with alcoholWebNov 27, 2024 · I have submitted my manuscript to one of the peer-reviewed journals of chemistry and the decision was 'recommended for publication subject to minor revision'. I … solar panel for motorcycleWeb1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of research. 2. Personal biases are elevated above … slushed face whatsapp emojiWebReviewer #I recommended publication; Reviewer #2 suggested 5 or 6 major modifications, any one of which would require essentially the researching and writing of another paper, and 2 or 3 years of ... solar panel for mobile phone chargingWebJan 8, 2014 · First, if you agree with the reviewer, you should do exactly what the reviewer ask you to do, and mention that you have done it. Then the reviewer should be happy. Second, you can disagree with the reviewer and explain why you disagree. In this case, you only need to explain why you disagree. But you need to explain well why. solar panel for phone chargingWebRecommend Immediate-Reject If you feel the manuscript is 1) out of the scope of TMI, or 2) the quality is too low to meet TMI standards, or 3) the novelty of the work is insignificant, or 4) just “good” instead of “exceptional” or “excellent”, you are encouraged to recommend an immediate reject without pursuing the full review process. solar panel for rv trailer battery charging